Famous+Scientist



Scientist's Name:Rosland Franklin

Born:july 25th 1920

Died/Present:died at age 37 of ovarian cancer

Country Born:born in London

School: Saint Pauls girl school in London

Area(s) of Science:roseland was a biophycist,physists,chemists,bioligist,and an x-ray crystilographer

Fame:She was the first to take x-ray pictures of dna strands.She built an accurate model of B-DNA.She worked on nucleac acids.

Interesting fact/quote:she was the first to get an x-ray of B-DNA or otherwise photo 51.She even paticipated in sports.

Web Address:Google,

Your Name:Andrew Parkhurst

Science Block:4

Famous Scientist Wanted Poster: Grading Rubric X || ............... ||
 * ** Basic Requirements Met? ** || ** Y ** || ** N ** ||
 * Name of the scientists is included || ...............
 * Dates born and died (or present if still living) ||  || X (died date) ||
 * Country where they were born || X ||  ||
 * Area of science studied || X ||  ||
 * Schooling || X ||  ||
 * Famous for || X ||  ||
 * Interesting fact or quote || X ||  ||
 * Web address || X ||  ||
 * Name/science period || X ||  ||
 * On wiki site || X ||  ||


 * Total: 9/ 10 **

** Written Requirements ** No factual errors found.** || The information you presented was somewhat accurate. One fact was not reported correctly. || The information you presented was mostly wrong. Only one or two facts were found to be true. || The information you presented was completely inaccurate. || text by presenting the facts clearly in your own words.** || You kind of understood what you read in the informational text, which was evident through your fuzzy writing. A fact was not clearly discussed. || You understood very little of the meaning of what you read in the informational text. This was clear through copying of facts rather than a discussion of them. || You completely missed the meaning of the informational text. The text may have been above your reading level. || errors. ** || There were three to five grammatical errors. || There were more than five grammatical errors. || technical presentation. || **A good amount of time and effort went into this project. It was missing one or two technical presentation pieces.** || Some time and effort went into this project. However, there were incomplete and/or missing technical presention pieces that were carelessly over looked. || Little to no time and effort went into this project. It was carelessly thrown together. This is evident through the lack of technical presentation. ||
 * ** 4 ** || ** 3 ** || ** 2 ** || ** 1 ** ||
 * **The facts you presented was right on.
 * **You stayed on the topic 100% of the time.** || You lost focus of the topic once, but corrected and got back on track. || You lost focus of the topic you were writing about a lot. || You didn't have a focus and the writing was completely off topic. ||
 * **You demonstrated a complete understanding of the informational
 * There were no spelling errors. || There were one or two spelling errors. || **There were three to five spelling errors.** || <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">There were more than five spelling errors. ||
 * <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">There were no grammatical errors. || **<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">There were one or two grammatical
 * It is obvious a lot of time went into this project. It is sound in

<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">**Total:20__/24__**

//Project Grade// 88%